国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學院 > 網絡通信 > 正文

RFC340 - Proposed Telnet Changes

2019-11-04 11:24:48
字體:
來源:轉載
供稿:網友

  Network Working Group Tom O'Sullivan
Request for Comments: 340 Raytheon Company
NIC 9933 Sudbury, Mass.
Categories: Telnet
References: RFC328 15 May 1972

PROPOSED TELNET CHANGES

The proposed change to the TELNET protocol calling for one standard
protocol and dropping the idea of minimum implementation seems
reasonable at this time.

I suggest that both Data Types and Hide Your Input be kept for the
following reasons:

Data Types:

The objection stating that switching out of ASCII results in an
irreversible change and loss of control can be met by requiring other
codes to provide to a return to ASCII. Each other code may have its
own return code, however, it may not always be employed. Other codes
are important for alphanumeric terminals that have special devices
attached. Several potential cases can be cited:

1. Cal comp plotter attached to a teletype has logic permitting a
program to turn the plotter on and off. When Operating I believe
it uses an 8 bit code which could conflict with Telnet signals.

2. Numerically controlled machines, either controlled from a user
terminal or code prepared by a HOST computer to be punched on the
paper tape punch at a teletype way require the use of an arbitrary
8 bit code.

3. EXPeriments controlled from alphanumeric terminal or sensor data
collected through a cal-comp like connection may require the use
of a full 8 bit code.

In these cases a transparent data type with a provision for a return
to ASCII mode seems desirable.

As more and more use of data base systems in the network is
considered, the need for and importance of using access keys,
passWords, etc. grows. The fact that it is difficult to select the
length of input to be hidden is not a persuasive argument. Potential
solutions seem to exist, e.g. the protocol could provide for accepting
length statements from the user program, data base system, operating
system, etc. and in default of this, use a default length representing
the server system expected optimum length.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]

發表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 杭锦后旗| 张北县| 岳西县| 五常市| 黄大仙区| 浦江县| 克东县| 蓝田县| 丹寨县| 都匀市| 区。| 靖安县| 洱源县| 亚东县| 玉门市| 盘锦市| 南安市| 容城县| 沅江市| 鹤峰县| 宁国市| 罗田县| 修文县| 兴仁县| 海口市| 华坪县| 高密市| 兴山县| 乌苏市| 巍山| 惠安县| 莆田市| 宕昌县| 金寨县| 赤城县| 容城县| 红桥区| 安新县| 揭阳市| 湘乡市| 保亭|