国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學院 > 網絡通信 > 正文

RFC603 - Response to RFC597: Host status

2019-11-04 11:20:23
字體:
來源:轉載
供稿:網友

  Network Working Group J.D. Burchfiel
RFC# 603 BBN-TENEX
NIC # 21022 31 December, 1973

Response to RFC# 597: Host Status

I have several questions about the November 1973 ARPANET
topographical map:

1. AMES is 4-connected, i.e. four network connections will go down
if the IMP fails. Is there some aspiration that IMPs should be
no more than three connected?

2. The seven IMPS in the Washington area are arranged into a loop.
This guarantees that local communication can take place even if
one connection fails, and is PRobably a worthwhile preparation
for area routing. On the other hand, for example, a break
between MIT-ipC and MIT-MAC will require them to communicate
through a 12-hop path through Washington. This can be remedied
by a short (ineXPensive) connection between Harvard and Lincoln
Labs. Is there a plan to pull the Boston area, the San
Francisco area, and the Los Angeles area into loops like the
Washington area?

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 10/99 ]

發表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 武冈市| 马关县| 汉川市| 兴义市| 玉龙| 麟游县| 平利县| 汪清县| 乐业县| 四子王旗| 定边县| 龙岩市| 峡江县| 监利县| 灌云县| 宣化县| 鄯善县| 南昌市| 中宁县| 上高县| 南溪县| 嘉荫县| 龙川县| 沿河| 南丹县| 康马县| 杭州市| 肃宁县| 万盛区| 开阳县| 二连浩特市| 鸡泽县| 仙游县| 临沭县| 建昌县| 江油市| 白水县| 思茅市| 贵定县| 潮安县| 五大连池市|