国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學院 > 網絡通信 > 正文

RFC1438 - Internet Engineering Task Force Statements Of Boredom (SOBs)

2019-11-04 10:46:36
字體:
來源:轉載
供稿:網友

  Network Working Group L. Chapin
Request for Comments: 1438 BBN
C. Huitema
INRIA
1 APRil 1993

Internet Engineering Task Force
Statements Of Boredom (SOBs)

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.

Discussion

The current IETF process has two types of RFCs: standards track
documents and other RFCs (e.g., informational, eXPerimental, FYIs).
The intent of the standards track documents is clear, and culminates
in an official Internet Standard. Informational RFCs can be
published on a less formal basis, subject to the reasonable
constraints of the RFCEditor. Informational RFCs are not subject to
peer review and carry no significance whatsoever within the IETF
process.

The IETF currently has no mechanism or means of publishing documents
that express its deep concern about something important, but
otherwise contain absolutely no useful information whatsoever. This
document creates a new subseries of RFCs, entitled, IETF Statements
Of Boredom (SOBs). The SOB process is similar to that of the normal
standards track. The SOB is submitted to the IAB, the IRSG, the
IESG, the SOB Editor (Morpheus), and the Academie Francais for
review, analysis, reprodUCtion in triplicate, translation into ASN.1,
and distribution to Internet insomniacs. However, once everyone has
approved the document by falling asleep over it, the process ends and
the document is discarded. The resulting vacuum is viewed as having
the technical approval of the IETF, but it is not, and cannot become,
an official Internet Standard.

References

[1] Internet Activities Board, "The Internet Standards Process", RFC
1310, IAB, March 1992.

[2] Postel, J., Editor, "IAB OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS", RFC1410,
IAB, March 1993.

Security Considerations

Security issues are not discussed in this memo, but then again, no
other issues of any importance are discussed in this memo either.

Authors' Addresses

A. Lyman Chapin
Bolt, Beranek & Newman
Mail Stop 20/5b
150 Cambridge Park Drive
Cambridge, MA 02140
USA

Phone: 1 617 873 3133
EMail: Lyman@BBN.COM

Christian Huitema
INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis
2004 Route des Lucioles
BP 109
F-06561 Valbonne Cedex
France

Phone: +33 93 65 77 15
EMail: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR

發表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 方正县| 类乌齐县| 屯昌县| 曲水县| 蒲城县| 化隆| 龙井市| 民勤县| 固阳县| 扎鲁特旗| 黄大仙区| 杭锦旗| 台中市| 永定县| 如皋市| 客服| 托克逊县| 浦江县| 普兰店市| 武冈市| 柳林县| 台南县| 治县。| 奉新县| 饶阳县| 邳州市| 台中县| 武胜县| 高陵县| 安宁市| 昔阳县| 故城县| 黔西县| 林州市| 枣阳市| 澄江县| 清徐县| 靖西县| 通州市| 海林市| 东兰县|