国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學院 > 網絡通信 > 正文

CISCO GSR與Juniper骨干路由器比較

2019-11-05 00:39:17
字體:
來源:轉載
供稿:網友

  CISCO 千兆交換路由器(GSR)體系結構
   
  
  Cisco 12012 全交換總線結構
   
  CISCO GSR仍然是基于對傳統路由器的改進,增強了路由器處理器(RP)和增加了專用的ASIC接口處理器。采用接口分布式處理和單一(或冗余)的CPU處理,仍然基于總線結構。
  GSR 接口卡
  
   
  GSR 路由處理器
  
   
   
  采用RISC 處理器:
  
  IDT R5000 RedUCed Instruction Set Computing (RISC) PRocessor used for the CPU. The CPU runs at an external bus clock speed of 100 MHz and an internal clock speed of 200 MHz.
  配置內存包括:
  DRAMM—Up to 256 megabytes (MB) of parity-protected, extended data output (EDO) dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) on two, 60-nanosecond (ns), dual in-line memory modules (DIMMs). 128 MB of DRAM is the minimum shipping configuration for the GRP.
   SRAM—512 kilobytes (KB) of static random-access memory (SRAM) for secondary CPU cache memory functions. (SRAM is not user configurable or field upgradeable.)
   NVRAM—512 KB of nonvolatile RAM (NVRAM). (NVRAM is not user configurable or field upgradeable.)
       Memory—Most of the additional memory components used by the system, including onboard Flash memory and up to two Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA)-based Flash memory cards.
  Juniper骨干路由器體系結構
  
  
  
  體系結構
  
  兩個要害部件:Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE)、Routing Engine,, which are connected via a 100-Mbps link.
  
  _ PFE完成分組的轉發,包括Flexible PIC Concentrators (FPCs), physical interface cards (PICs), System Control Board (SCB), and state-of-the-art ASICs.
  
  _ Routing Engine維護路由表,控制路由選擇協議。Intel-based PCI platform running JUNOS software.
  
  Leading-edge ASICs
  
  ASICs deliver a comprehensive hardware-based system for packet processing, including route lookups, filtering, sampling, rate limiting, load balancing, buffer management, switching, encapsulation, and de-encapsulation functions. To ensure a non-blocking forwarding path, all channels between the ASICs are oversized, dedicated paths.
  
  Internet Processor II ASIC
  
  The Internet Processor II™ ASIC supports a lookup rate of over 40 Mpps. With over one million gates, the Internet Processor II ASIC delivers high-speed forwarding performance with advanced services, such as filtering and sampling, enabled. It is the largest, fastest, and most advanced ASIC ever implemented on a router platform and deployed in the Internet.
  
  Distributed Buffer Manager ASICs
  
  The Distributed Buffer Manager ASICs allocate incoming data packets throughout shared memory on the FPCs. This singlestage buffering improves performance by requiring only one write to and one read from shared memory. There are no extraneous steps of copying packets from input buffers to output buffers. The shared memory is completely nonblocking, which in turn, prevents head-of-line blocking.
  
  I/O Manager ASICs
  
  Each FPC is equipped with an I/O Manager ASIC that supports packet parsing, packet prioritizing, and queuing. This ASIC divides the packets, stores them in shared memory (managed by the Distributed Buffer Manager ASICs), and reassembles the packets for transmission.
  
  Media-specific ASICs
  
  The media-specific ASICs perform physical layer functions, such as framing. Each PIC is equipped with an ASIC or FPGA that performs control functions tailored to the PIC’s media type.
  
  Packet Forwarding Engine
  
  The PFE provides Layer 2 and Layer 3 packet switching, route lookups, and packet forwarding. The Internet Processor II ASIC forwards up to 40 Mpps for all packet sizes. The throughput is 40+ Gbps.
  
  The PFE supports the same ASIC-based features supported by other M-series routers. For example, class-of-service features include rate limiting, classification, priority queuing, Random Early Detection, and Weighted Round Robin to increase bandwidth efficiency. Filtering and sampling are also available for restricting access, increasing security, and analyzing network traffic.
  
  Finally, the PFE delivers maximum stability during exceptional conditions, while also providing a significantly lower part count. This stability reduces power consumption and increases mean time between failure.
  
  Flexible PIC Concentrators
  
  The FPCs house PICs and connect them to the rest of the PFE. There is a dedicated, full-duplex 3.2-Gbps channel between each FPC and the core of the PFE.
  
  You can insert up to eight FPCs in an M40 chassis. The OC-48c/STM-16 PIC occupies an entire FPC. Otherwise, each FPC supports up to four PICs in any combination, providing unparalleled interface density and configuration flexibility. Each FPC contains shared memory for storing data packets received; the Distributed Buffer Manager ASICs on the SCB manage this memory. In addition, the FPC houses the I/O Manager ASIC, which performs a variety of queue management and class-of-service functions.
  
  Physical Interface Cards
  
  PICs provide a complete range of fiber optic and electrical transmission interfaces to the network. The M40 router offers flexibility and conserves rack space by supporting a wide variety of PICs and port densities. All PICs occupy one of four PIC spaces per FPC except for the OC-48c/STM-16 PIC, which occupies an entire FPC slot. An additional Tunnel Services PIC enables the M40 router to function as the ingress or egress point of an IP-IP unicast tunnel, a Cisco generic routing encapsulation (GRE) tunnel, or a Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) tunnel.
  
  For a list of available PICs, see the M-series Internet Backbone Routers Physical Interface Cards datasheet.
  
  System Control Board
  
  Hosting the Internet Processor II ASIC, the SCB performs sampling, filtering, and packet forwarding decisions. The SCB also houses a processor that processes exception and control packets, monitors system components, and controls FPC resets.
  
  Routing Engine
  
  The Routing Engine maintains the routing tables and controls the routing protocols, as well as the JUNOS software processes that control the router’s interfaces, the chassis components, system management, and user access to the router. These routing and software processes run on top of a kernel that interacts with the PFE. _ The Routing Engine processes all routing protocol updates from the network, so PFE performance is not affected.
  
  _ The Routing Engine constructs and maintains routing tables with a complete set of Internet features and provides full flexibility for advertising, filtering, and modifying routes. Routing policies are set according to route parameters, such as prefixes, prefix lengths, and BGP attributes.
  
  JUNOS Internet Software
  
  JUNOS software is optimized to scale to large numbers of network interfaces and routes. The software consists of a series of system processes running in protected memory on top of an independent Operating system. The modular design improves reliability by protecting against system-wide failure and by preventing the failure of one process from affecting the other software processes. JUNOS software offers unmatched configuration flexibility by providing an xml-based JUNOScript™ API in addition to the CLI interface.
  
  總結和觀點
  
       CISCO從1984年開發出他的第一臺路由器到今天網絡技術發展經歷的是一個多元化到IP統一的發展過程,其實至今網絡應用中也還存在大量的SNA、AppleTalk、TokenRing、FDDI等。CISCO長期占據市場絕對優勢也在于他的產品可以提供完全的解決方案。到今天,這成了CISCO的優勢,也在一定程度上成為了CISCO的包袱。
  
       我們再看看Juniper推出第一臺路由器的時候,IP統一的趨勢已經浮出水面,骨干網絡上IP與ATM的爭論也幾乎證實骨干網絡上跑IP數據包將成為技術發展趨勢。這時候Juniper推出第一臺骨干路由器,他就看準了IP技術這一個潮流。他沒有這個包袱,而且不準確的說可能至今Juniper還沒有推出支持SNA、AppleTalk、TokenRing、FDDI的路由器。
  
       從硬件結構上面可以看出,CISCO堅持的是RISC CPU的方式,也許CISCO認為他的網絡設備基于強大的IOS軟件其功能擴展能力非常強而一直認為自己的軟件廠商。Juniper的路由器增加了許多專用的ASIC處理芯片,而且其本身的軟件設計的時候沒有CISCO那樣那么多的包袱,所以在他特定功能內Juniper的性能顯得比強出CISCO。也許我們應該承認 Juniper在ASIC等基于硬件方面的技術確實比CISCO先進,也有說法說是Juniper路由器最初設計者是從CISCO的ASIC部門離開的,雖然后面這種說法可能沒有根據,但從Juniper產品體系結構可以看出Juniper似乎堅持的是他的硬件處理能力和ASIC設計方面的技術優勢。我們沒有理由說CISCO確GSR 12012只有60G背板處理能力就不如其背板處理能力可達256G的6509多層交換機。也許CISCO放棄多年來最終對自己的定位——軟件廠商,他也許可以集中力量在6509上面發展L3處理能力和ASIC技術,這也就可能不會在某些方面不如Juniper,這也許就不會有現在在市場上取得非常成功的GSR了。
  
       Juniper完全可以象國內路由器廠家,推出和CISCO的IOS完全相似的用戶接口的網絡操作系統,而且這樣做確實有利于已經對CISCO配置界面熟悉的網絡工程師使用Juniper網絡設備。但Juniper沒有這樣做,Juniper推出的第一臺路由器就是骨干網絡路由器,Juniper自始至終就是把CISCO作為其競爭的打擊的對手,而不是作為學習的對象。他的定位非常之高,后來也證實其定位對于市場運做幫助非常大。為什么華為的高端路由器一直沒有取得巨大成功呢?在用戶心中可能都覺得華為是在學習CISCO,其實國內的路由器廠商都有這樣問題,不能說明他們高端路由器產品真的CISCO差很遠,尤其性能價格比會比CISCO差很遠。他們為了方便用戶操作,采用的與CISCO相似的用戶界面,而用戶反過來常問的是這些廠家擁有自主知識產權的操作系統是不是從CISCO購買的?有幾個廠家的產品考慮兼容性和成本的時候不是參考和研究過其他廠家的產品呢?
  
  以上分析只是基于本人對核心路由器膚淺的熟悉,旨在拋磚引玉!
  本人沒有推廣或配置過Juniper的路由器,也還沒有在打標中遭遇推廣Juniper路由器的競爭對手,因此非常希望業界前輩對于本人不成熟的觀點給予指正!


發表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 衡东县| 金阳县| 望谟县| 浦县| 固镇县| 大足县| 灯塔市| 定边县| 承德市| 克拉玛依市| 柘城县| 苍山县| 西贡区| 德江县| 永仁县| 无极县| 砚山县| 木兰县| 谷城县| 江安县| 沙雅县| 紫云| 侯马市| 永兴县| 聊城市| 崇州市| 定安县| 淮阳县| 法库县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 重庆市| 城口县| 报价| 祁东县| 外汇| 临沂市| 长宁区| 宁都县| 穆棱市| 滦南县| 瓮安县|