国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學院 > 網絡通信 > 正文

RFC781 - Specification of the Internet Protocol (IP) timestamp option

2019-11-04 11:40:01
字體:
來源:轉載
供稿:網友
RFC781 Zaw-Sing Su
SRI
May 1981

A SPECIFICATION OF THE INTERNET PROTOCOL (ip) TIMESTAMP OPTION

I. INTRODUCTION

Packet switching is store-and-forward by nature. Network delay is a
therefore a critical performance measure for packet-switching communications.
A catenet is a system of packet-switched communication networks interconnected
via gateways [Cerf 78]. The catenet "link" delays are thus variable. Their
measurement, the measurement of delays across member networks of a catenet,
becomes important for catenet investigations.

An effective way to measure catenet delays is by means of packet header
timestamping. Header timestamping allows monitoring of catenet delays for
user traffic, such as the case of Ft. Bragg users accessing ISID across the
catenet. Packet header timestamping is also compatible with the use of test
packets for catenet delay measurement. Another advantage of header
timestamping is that since it is an IP option, the gateway imposes little
difference in the treatment of such a packet. In this note, a specification
of the timestamp option format for IP is presented.

Measurement of one-way delay, either end-to-end or across an individual
network, requires that device clocks be synchronized, using such facilities as
WWVB clocks [Mills 81]. This specification assumes this capability in the
gateways and involved network hosts.

II. FORMAT SPECIFICATION

As an IP option, the contents of the first two octets are dictated by the
IP header format to be option type and option length in octets [Postel 80].
The next two octets are used to control this option.

0 7 15 23 31
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
type length offset overflw flags
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
internet ID
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
time stamp
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
.
.
.

option type = 68 decimal (i.e., option class = 2 and option number = 4);

option length = the number of octets with a maximum of 40 (limited by
IHL = 15);

offset = the number of octets from the beginning of this option to the
end of timestamps (i.e., the beginning of space for next
timestamp). It is set to one, an odd number, when no more
space remains in the header for timestamps;

overflow = the number of IP modules that cannot register timestamps due
to lack of space;

flag = 0 -- time stamps only
1 -- each timestamp is preceded with internet ID of the
registering entity
3 -- the internet ID fields are prespecified. An IP module only
registers its timestamp if it matches its own ID with the
next specified internet ID;

internet ID = ID for the timestamping device;

timestamp = a right-justified, 32-bit timestamp in milliseconds modulo
24 hours from midnight UT.

The timestamp option is not copied upon fragmentation. It is carried in
the first fragment.

REFERENCES

[Cerf 78] Cerf, V., "The Catenet Model for Internetworking," Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency, Information Processing
Techniques Office, IEN 48, July 1978.

[Mills 81] Mills, D.L., "DCNET Internet Clock Service," RFC778, COMSAT
Laboratories, April 1981.

[Postel 80] Postel, J. (ed.), "DoD Standard Transport Internet Protocol,"
Defense Advanced Reseach Projects Agency, Information Processing
Techniques Office, RFC760, IEN 128, January 1980.


發表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 兴义市| 汉川市| 边坝县| 乌苏市| 伊金霍洛旗| 陈巴尔虎旗| 大足县| 安溪县| 太保市| 巢湖市| 博白县| 新河县| 昌乐县| 阿拉善右旗| 溧阳市| 军事| 北海市| 平定县| 阜平县| 许昌县| 平谷区| 宣威市| 调兵山市| 乐都县| 晋宁县| 太仆寺旗| 婺源县| 江川县| 东城区| 乳源| 襄垣县| 静海县| 太白县| 石家庄市| 武城县| 平邑县| 洛阳市| 来凤县| 成安县| 炎陵县| 墨脱县|