国产探花免费观看_亚洲丰满少妇自慰呻吟_97日韩有码在线_资源在线日韩欧美_一区二区精品毛片,辰东完美世界有声小说,欢乐颂第一季,yy玄幻小说排行榜完本

首頁 > 學(xué)院 > 網(wǎng)絡(luò)通信 > 正文

RFC3266 - Support for IPv6 in Session Description Protocol (SDP)

2019-11-04 02:07:16
字體:
供稿:網(wǎng)友

  Network Working Group S. Olson
Request for Comments: 3266 Microsoft
Updates: 2327 G. Camarillo
Category: Standards Track EriCSSon
A. B. Roach
dynamicsoft
June 2002

Support for ipv6 in session Description PRotocol (SDP)

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This document describes the use of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
addresses in conjunction with the Session Description Protocol (SDP).
Specifically, this document clarifies existing text in SDP with
regards to the syntax of IPv6 addresses.

1. IntrodUCtion

SDP is intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes
of session announcement, session invitation, and other forms of
multimedia session initiation. It is a text format description that
provides many details of a multimedia session including: the
originator of the session, a URL related to the session, the
connection address for the session media(s), and optional attributes
for the session media(s). Each of these pieces of information may
involve one or more IPv6 addresses. The ABNF for IP addresses in SDP
currently leaves the syntax for IPv6 addresses undefined. This
document attempts to complete the ABNF to include IPv6 addresses.

Accordingly, the address type "IP6" indicating an IPv6 address,
should be allowed in the connection field, "c=", of the SDP. The
ABNF already reflects this, though the "Connection Data" text under
section 6 of RFC2328 currently only defines the "IP4" address type.

2. Terminology

The key Words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [5].

3. Syntax

RFC2373 [1] gives an ABNF for the text representation of IPv6
addresses in Appendix B. RFC2732 [3] covers the text representation
of IPv6 addresses when used within a URL. Using the ABNF described
in these documents, the following updated ABNF for SDP is proposed.

uri = ; defined in RFC1630 and RFC2732

multicast-address = IP4-multicast / IP6-multicast

IP4-multicast = m1 3*( "." decimal-uchar )
"/" ttl [ "/" integer ]
; IPv4 multicast addresses may be in the
; range 224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255

m1 = ("22" ("4"/"5"/"6"/"7"/"8"/"9")) /
("23" DIGIT ))

IP6-multicast = heXPart
; IPv6 address starting with FF

addr = FQDN / unicast-address

FQDN = 4*(alpha-numeric/"-"/".")
; fully qualified domain name as specified
; in RFC1035
unicast-address = IP4-address / IP6-address

IP4-address = b1 3*("." decimal-uchar) / "0.0.0.0"

b1 = decimal-uchar
; less than "224"; not "0" or "127"

; The following is from RFC2373 Appendix B. It is a direct copy.
IP6-address = hexpart [ ":" IP4-address ]

hexpart = hexseq / hexseq "::" [ hexseq ] /
"::" [ hexseq ]

hexseq = hex4 *( ":" hex4)

hex4 = 1*4HEXDIG

4. Example SDP description with IPv6 addresses

The following is an example SDP description using the above ABNF for
IPv6 addresses. In particular, the origin and connection fields
contain IPv6 addresses.

v=0
o=nasa1 971731711378798081 0 IN IP6 2201:056D::112E:144A:1E24
s=(Almost) live video feed from Mars-II satellite
p=+1 713 555 1234
c=IN IP6 FF1E:03AD::7F2E:172A:1E24
t=3338481189 3370017201
m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 2
a=rtpmap:2 G726-32/8000
m=video 6024 RTP/AVP 107
a=rtpmap:107 H263-1998/90000

5. Note for implementors

An implementation may receive an SDP session description with an IPv6
address whose format [1] is internally that of an IPv4 mapped
address. Note that such an address is actually the address of an
IPv4-only node, and implementors are warned to interpret IPv4 mapped
addresses as equivalent to IP4.

6. IANA Considerations

This document updates the definition of the IP6 addrtype parameter
found in RFC2327.

7. Security Considerations

No additional considerations above what is stated in section 7 of RFC
2327.

8. References

[1] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture", RFC2373, July 1998.

[2] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
Protocol", RFC2327, April 1998.

[3] Hinden, R., Carpenter, B. and L. Masinter, "Format for Literal
IPv6 Addresses in URL's", RFC2732, December 1999.

[4] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC2234, November 1997.

[5] Bradner, S., "Key words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC2119, March 1997.

9. Authors' Addresses

Sean Olson
Microsoft
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
USA

EMail: seanol@microsoft.com

Gonzalo Camarillo
Ericsson
Advanced Signalling Research Lab.
FIN-02420 Jorvas
Finland

Phone: +358 9 299 3371
Fax: +358 9 299 3118
EMail: Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com

Adam Roach
dynamicsoft
5100 Tennyson Parkway
Suite 1200
Plano, TX 75024
USA

EMail: adam@dynamicsoft.com
Voice: <sip:adam@dynamicsoft.com>

10. Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFCEditor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.


發(fā)表評論 共有條評論
用戶名: 密碼:
驗證碼: 匿名發(fā)表
主站蜘蛛池模板: 达拉特旗| 科尔| 丰都县| 古交市| 从江县| 信阳市| 铜川市| 三台县| 建昌县| 沙洋县| 岗巴县| 拉萨市| 姜堰市| 雅安市| 郓城县| 正定县| 无为县| 许昌市| 济南市| 滨海县| 汾阳市| 海淀区| 虞城县| 南部县| 安新县| 壤塘县| 丰宁| 广州市| 靖边县| 都江堰市| 小金县| 新郑市| 江源县| 报价| 北流市| 铁力市| 香港| 萍乡市| 江城| 炉霍县| 樟树市|